2005, Cilt 18, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 017-023
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE SİGARA BIRAKMA SIKLIĞI VE DAVRANIŞ ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Ruhuşen Kutlu, Kamile MARAKOĞLU
Department of Family Physician, Medicine Faculty of Meram, University of Selcuk, Konya, Turkıye
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sigara bırakma, üniversite öğrencileri, sosyodemografik veriler
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmada Konya’da üniversite öğrencilerinde sigara bırakma sıklığı ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı.

Metot: Bu çalışmada 613 sigarayı bırakan üniversite öğrencisi yer almıştır. Katılanlar 17 farklı fakülteden çok aşamalı örneklem yoluyla seçilmiştir. Veriler yüzyüze görüşülerek uygulanan anket yoluyla elde edilmiştir. İstatistiksel analiz için ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır.

Sonuç: Sigarayı bırakanların çoğunluğu (%98) sigaraya 21 yaş altında başlamıştı ve %70’i sigaranın zararlı etkileri hakkında bilgiye sahipti. Sigara bırakmada en etkin yol olarak aniden bırakma tespit edildi (%55.7).

Netice: Türkiye’de sigara içme alışkanlığı önemli bir halk sağlığı problemidir. Etkili ve kapsamlı bir ulusal sigara control programına acilen ihtiyaç vardır.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Giriş
    Cigarette smoking is the most important avoidable cause of morbidity and premature death in the developed world 1,2. The harmful effects of smoking on health are now well known 3,4. Such effects include the direct action of cigarette on the respiratory tract, causing emphysema, bronchopneumonia, bronchitis and cancer of the lung, as well as more indirect action on other organs such as heart, pancreas, bladder, stomach, uterus etc 5,6. It is therefore important to determine why people begin smoking, because most smokers start smoking soon after starting secondary and high school. Adolescent smoking is thus a communicable disorder, and may be preventable by measures that reduce exposure to other smokers 1,7-9. Having close friends who smoked and being encouraged by close friends to smoke were strong risk factors for smoking 7,10,11.

    The most effective programs start from the principle that youth have to learn skills to resist pro-smoking pressure from peers, family, media, and advertising 12,13. Anti-smoking school education can postpone smoking initiation by some year. One possible measure to reduce the percentage of youth smokers is introducing an age limit for tobacco sales. This has been adopted by many countries, most setting the age limit at 18 years of age 12.

    Nicotine, a key ingredient in tobacco products, is an addictive drug. The difficulties in smoking cessation are suggested to be related to nicotine 14. Addiction to nicotine involves the interaction of psychological, physical, behavioral, and social factors 3,4,15. Current health education activities against smoking should be continued and extended to the young population to further reduce the prevalence of smoking and its health consequences 16-18. If a smoker has been thinking about giving up, advice from health care professionals can encourage him to stop 4,19.

    The WHO has estimated that the number of deaths each year from smoking-attributable disease will increase to 10 million within the next 30 years or so, of which 70 % will occur in developing countries 20-22. Prevention and treatment of tobacco use have been targeted by the WHO as a priority in developing countries. However, such efforts are difficult because tobacco companies have applied active marketing and economic pressure to these countries, which are enticed by increased revenues provided by tobacco use 23. Thus tobacco consumption is decreasing by 1 % per year in industrialized nations and increasing by about 2% per year in developing countries 24.

    Cigarette smoking not only increases risk of death among older adults but also affects quality of life and physical functioning 25. Smoking cessation at any age reduces the overall risk of death 26. Smoking cessation also decreases the risk of developing lung and other cancers 27.

    Psychological and behavioral factors affecting the success in quitting smoking must be established. 23. Health promotion at schools was considered very important because people usually start smoking before the age of 20. Therefore, focusing attention on smoking cessation among the university students is an immediate and urgent priority for public health professionals 26,28.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Materyal ve Metot
    This study was performed by using multiphase sampling among 4504 university students who were selected from 17 faculties of Selçuk University in 2003-2004 academic year. In this period, 63000 students were educating in the university. In this study, we only selected faculties which had 45000 students. Vocational high schools were not included. We used multiphase sampling. Participants were first divided into faculties, after that classes and then gender. We randomly selected from every strata by using 10% sampling. Consequently we reached 4504 students. Data were obtained via the questionnaire form by interviewing. At first step, the students’ smoking status was defined as never-smoker, ever-smoker, and ex-smoker. At second step, ex-smoker students were selected. This study consisted of 613 ex-smoker university students.

    Ever- smokers were defined as those who had smoked 100 cigarettes and now smoked either every day (i.e., daily smokers) or some days (i.e., some-day smokers). Ex- smokers had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lives but did not currently smoke. The minimum quitting period for the ex-smokers was accepted as 6 months. Never-smokers were defined as those who had never smoked.

    This special questionnaire included 44 items and contained the students’ socio-demographic characteristics, opinions related to smoking cessation, the status of smoking in family, and the effects of TV programs on smoking cessation. Participants answered questions on the following factors:

    Socio-demographic characteristics: gender, marital status, age, faculty, class, place of living, place of residence, participation in sport activities, the use of another addictive substance, Family characteristics: father’s occupation, mother’s occupation, father’s and mother’s educational level, the status of smoking in family.

    Opinions related to smoking cessation: the reason of smoking cessation, the effect of TV programs on smoking cessation, the way of smoking cessation, effectiveness of TV programs related harmful effects of smoking, reactions to TV programs related smoking.

    Smoking-related habits before quitting smoking: the initiation age of smoking, duration of smoking, the reason to start smoking, believing the hazards of smoking, being under effect of the advertisements related with smoking.

    DATA ANALYSIS
    The data were entered into a personal computer using the SPSS statistical package. Chi-square and analysis of variance were used to test for baseline differences in demographic and smoking-history variables. Statistical significance was defined as p< 0.05.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Bulgular
    This study was performed by using multiphase sampling according to faculties, classes and gender by using 10% sampling among 4504 university students. The student’s smoking status was defined as never-smoker, ever-smoker, and ex-smoker. Of the students in this study, 36 % (n=1621) were ever-smokers 13.6 % (n=613) were ex-smokers, 50.4 % (n=2270) were never smokers. For this study, ex-smokers were separated.

    Of the students in this study 33.1% (n=203) were female, 66.9% (n=410) were male, 92.3% (n=566) were single, and 7.7% (n=47) were married. The age interval of participants was 17-31 years. The majority of students (90.2%) were not using another addictive substance. Socio- demographic characteristics of study subjects were shown in Table I. In this study, the mothers’ educational levels were intermediate and low (92.3 %). In this paper, the smoking prevalence of fathers was 38.3%. 72.9% of family members were smoking (only father, only mother, brothers, or both parents).


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table I: Socio-demographic characteristics

    The most important reason of smoking-cessation was knowledge of harmful effects of smoking (51.1%). In the majority of participants (40.6 %), there was a negative opinion that TV programs on smoking-cessation were ineffective. The best way of smoking-cessation was sudden quitting (55.7 %). The majority of participants (56.7 %) had believed that effective TV programs related harmful effects of smoking were lacking. Approximately 88.8% of ex-smokers were watching TV programs related smoking. Table II shows opinions related with smoking cessation.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table II: Opinions related with smoking cessation

    We found that 3 % of ex-smokers began smoking before 9 years of age, 17 % of this group began smoking at 10-13 years of age. In the majority of ex-smokers (78.1 %) the initiation age of smoking was between 14-21 years. The most important reason to start smoking was social factors (environment, friend groups, etc) (39.1 %).Later, distress and anxiety were found (30.5 %) More than 70.7 percent of ex-smokers were believing the hazards of smoking. The majority of ex -smokers (65.4 %) have not ever wanted their children to smoke. Smoking-related habits before quitting smoking were shown in Table III. Differences of some parameters between smokers and ex-smokers were shown in table IV.


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table III: Smoking-related habits before quitting smoking


    Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın
    Table IV: Differences between ever-smokers and ex-smokers at different parameters

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Tartışma
    Adolescent smoking is a communicable disorder, and may be preventable by various measures 1,7. Smoking prevalence among adolescents has increased recently 29. Recent research has shown that children aged 12-17 years are susceptible to smoking 12. Adolescents are most likely exposed to the effects of both pro- and anti-tobacco advertising simultaneously 30. The results in table 1 show the influence of family on current smoking status. According to our data, the risk was highest when the father was a smoker.

    Unfortunately, the mass media have not been used adequately in Turkey to combat smoking. In the last census, total population was 67 million in Turkey. Turkish population is predominantly young; with 40.6 million above 15 years of age. Turkish laws are inadequately enforced to combat smoking. There is a light legislation against tobacco, including a ban on many forms of advertising, restrictions on smoking in many public places, prohibition to buy cigarette under 18 aged. Therefore, smoking rates in adolescents have continued to rise in recent years 31. Alikasifoğlu et al. also reported that the prevalence of smoking among Turkish high school students gradually increased. A significant increase was observed in cigarette experimentation rate across grades for both female and male students. Twenty- three percent of the students reported that they were current users 32. In this study, although the prevalence of ex-smokers was 13.6%, the prevalence of ever-smokers was 36 %.This high ratio was similar to other studies. Recent data from 1997 Youth Risk Behavior Survey suggest that youth smoking rates are increasing. The prevalence of smoking among high school seniors increased from 27.5% in 1991 to 36.4% in 1997 in USA 33,34.

    Scientific data demonstrate that tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death and illness. Smoking is a known cause of cancer, heart disease, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The prevalence of ever-smokers among Turkish adolescents was higher than US, European and other developed countries. Despite the tobacco companies have been aggressively expanding its markets in Asia, Turkey, Middle East, and other undeveloped countries, a small group of students had succeeded to stop smoking. In this paper, we found that the prevalence of ex-smokers was 13.6%. The Saudi Smoking Control Charitable Society reported that smoking cessation rate was 13% 20. This rate was 24.8% in USA 35. There was a significant difference. This may be of the because of the more effective smoking cessation protocols, educational programs at schools, anti-tobacco advertising, heavy laws to ban tobacco use. Tobacco use recently is the single, most important health disorder in Turkey. Thus, urgent effective cessation programs must be established.

    Having close friends and family members who smoked were strong factors for smoking 7,32. We found that the risk was highest when the father was a smoker. Parental smoking may cause children to view smoking as an acceptable adult behavior that is engaged in by those they most admire 33. In this paper, the smoking prevalence of fathers was 38.3 %. Unfortunately, 72.9 % of family members were smoking (only father, only mother, brothers, or both parents). Because of this high smoking ratio of family members, a wide health educational program for everybody must be arranged.

    Adolescents often attend to the health advice from their doctors than from parents or other adults 33. Both doctors and teachers can play an important role in preventing tobacco use among children by adopting and modeling effective prevention strategies.

    Young smokers listed 3 factors that would motivate them to try to stop smoking:

    1-the tobacco-related death or illness of a close relative,
    2-a request from their boyfriend or girlfriend,
    3-advice from their doctor 36

    We found that the most important reason of smoking cessation was knowledge of harmful effects of smoking (51.1 %). Later, health problems (13.9%) were appeared. These findings showed that health education, positive motivation, and effective cessation programs offered by health services could play an important role to quit smoking.

    The majority of participants (40.6%) hadn’t believed that TV programs on smoking-cessation were effective and sufficient. As much as possible, a measure’s effectiveness is quantified in terms of declines in tobacco consumption and smoking prevalence among youth (12). Unfortunately, because of insufficient laws, everybody can buy cigarette in our country.

    When we retrospectively examined former lifestyle of ex-smokers, the initiation age of smoking was under 21 years (98%). The most important reason to start smoking was social factors (environment, friend groups, etc.) This rate was 39.1%. Second major reason was distress and anxiety (30.5%). The majority of ex-smokers (70.7%) have believed the hazards of smoking. This belief positively influenced to stop smoking. Research and theory must be directed towards understanding why some individuals smoke and others do not 37,38. Further researches on the etiology of smoking in young people must be performed.

    Approximately 53.6% of ex-smokers were being under effect of the advertisement related with smoking. Fortunately, 65.4% of ex-smokers haven’t ever wanted their children smoke. Thus, the concept of a tobacco-free society must promote through involvement in anti-tobacco activities and educational projects in their local communities, organizations and educational institutions.

    We found that men were more susceptible than women to both smoking and quit smoking. This finding was in accordance with other studies 20,39. Although the causes are multifactorial, age, gender, having classmates, parents, teachers who smoked were very important19. The decision to stop smoking can be a long process which is established on behavioral change model. Smoking cessation is a dynamic process that occurs before, during and after the person quit 9.

    There was a meaningful relation with smoking and alcohol in our study. Among the ex-smokers the using ratio of alcohol was significantly lower than ever-smokers (p=0.001). In the faculties of social sciences, the rate of quitting smoking was significantly higher than the others (p=0.000). Tot et al. also reported that cigarette smoking was associated with alcohol use 10. Because of the rules of dormitories, residence at a dormitory was significantly more effective to quit smoking than the others (p=0.000).

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Sonuç
    The results of this study should help the development of anti-smoking policies in Turkey. A comprehensive strategy for smoking control must be established and adopted from other developing countries. Research teams should include representatives from a broad spectrum of disciplines, particularly educators and program providers. In the result of this multidisciplinary study, the information gathered will be useful in the identification of high risk groups and the design of interventions. Norms for not smoking and this comprehensive strategy must be supported through multiple channels in the community, and environmental incentives for non-smoking. Finally, an effective national comprehensive anti- smoking policy and a wide-ranging legislation against tobacco must be urgently established.
  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • Kaynaklar

    1) Molyneux A, Lewis S, Antoniak M, et al. Is smoking a communicable disease? Effect of exposure to ever smokers in school tutor groups on the risk of incident smoking in the first year of secondary school. Tob Control 2002; 11: 241-245.

    2) Park TK. Cigarette smoking patterns among students attending a Christian University in Seoul, Korea. Yonsei Med J 1981;22: 145-154.

    3) Kutlu R. Sigara içenler arkadaşınızı tanıyor musunuz? Konya: Selcuk Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayınları. 2002; 46: 11-72.

    4) Rajamaki H, Katajavuori N, Jarvinen P, Hakuli T, Terasalmi E, Pietila K. A qualitative study of the difficulties of smoking cessation; health care professionals' and smokers' points of view. Pharm World Sci 2002; 24: 240-246.

    5) Wynder EL, Hoffmann D. Tobacco and tobacco smoke. Semin Oncol 1976; 3: 5-15

    6) Hurt RD, Ebbert JO. Preventing lung cancer by stopping smoking. Clin Chest Med 2002; 23: 27-36.

    7) Lam TH, Chung SF, Betson CL, Wong CM, Hedley AJ. Tobacco advertisements: one of the strongest risk factors for smoking in Hong Kong students. Am J Prev Med 1998; 14: 217-223.

    8) Poulsen LH, Osler M, Roberts C, Due P, Damsgaard MT, Holstein BE. Exposure to teachers smoking and adolescent smoking behaviour: analysis of cross sectional data from Denmark. Tob Control 2002; 11: 246-251.

    9) Balch GI. Exploring perceptions of smoking cessation among high school smokers: input and feedback from focus groups. Prev Med 1998; 27: A55-63.

    10) Tot S, Yazici K, Yazici A, Metin O, Bal N, Erdem P. Psychosocial correlates of substance use among adolescents in Mersin, Turkey. Public Health 2004; 118: 588-593.

    11) Aytaclar S, Erkiran M, Kirisci L, Tarter R. Substance abuse and associated psychosocial risk factors among Turkish male adolescents. Addict Behav 2003; 28: 1419-1429.

    12) Willemsen MC, De Zwart WM. The effectiveness of policy and health education strategies for reducing adolescent smoking: a review of the evidence. J Adolesc 1999; 22: 587-599.

    13) White V, Hill D, Siahpush M, Bobevski I. How has the prevalence of cigarette smoking changed among Australian adults? Trends in smoking prevalence between 1980 and 2001. Tob Control 2003; 12 Suppl 2: ii67-74.

    14) Katz RC, Singh NN. Reflections on the ex-smoker: some findings on successful quitters. J Behav Med 1986; 9: 191-202.

    15) Forgays DG, Bonaiuto P, Wrzesniewski K, Forgays DK. Personality and cigarette smoking in Italy, Poland, and the United States. Int J Addict 1993; 28: 399-413.

    16) www.aafp.org/policy/issues/t3.html Tobacco and Smoking

    17) Jarallah JS, Bamgboye EA, al-Ansary LA, Kalantan KA. Predictors of smoking among male junior secondary school students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Tob Control 1996; 5: 26-29.

    18) Myers MG. Smoking intervention with adolescent substance abusers. Initial recommendations. J Subst Abuse Treat 1999; 16: 289-298.

    19) Behn V, Sotomayor H, Cruz M, Naveas R. Motivation to quit smoking among ex-smoker university workers and students] Rev Med Chil 2001; 129: 540-546. Spanish

    20) Jarallah JS, al-Rubeaan KA, al-Nuaim AR, al-Ruhaily AA, Kalantan KA. Prevalence and determinants of smoking in three regions of Saudi Arabia. Tob Control 1999 ; 8: 53-56.

    21) Jorenby DE, Leischow SJ, Nides MA, et al. A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 685-691.

    22) World Health Organization. Regioal Office For Europe. 2003. http://data.euro.who.int/Default.aspx?TabID=2404

    23) Balabanova D, Bobak M, McKee M. Patterns of smoking in Bulgaria. Tob Control 1998; 7: 383-385.

    24) Ockene JK, Chiriboga DE, Zevallos JC. Smoking in Ecuador: prevalence, knowledge, and attitudes. Tob Control 1996; 5: 121-126.

    25) Hyman DJ, Simons-Morton DG, Dunn JK, Ho K. Smoking, smoking cessation, and understanding of the role of multiple cardiac risk factors among the urban poor. Prev Med 1996; 25: 653-659.

    26) Husten CG, Shelton DM, Chrismon JH, Lin YC, Mowery P, Powell FA. Cigarette smoking and smoking cessation among older adults: United States, 1965-94. Tob Control 1997; 6: 175-180.

    27) Daver J, Bierme R. Short- and long-term benefits of smoking cessation] Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2001; 50 :224-228. French.

    28) Carrion Valero F,Hernandez Llopis J,Plaza Valia P. Smoking in health workers. Identification of related factors.Arch Bronconeumol 1998; 34: 379-383.

    29) Hurt RD, Croghan GA, Beede SD, Wolter TD, Croghan IT, Patten CA. Nicotine patch therapy in 101 adolescent smokers: efficacy, withdrawal symptom relief, and carbon monoxide and plasma cotinine levels. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 31-37.

    30) Straub DM, Hills NK, Thompson PJ, Moscicki AB. Effects of pro- and anti-tobacco advertising on nonsmoking adolescents' intentions to smoke. J Adolesc Health 2003; 32: 36-43.

    31) Altman DG, Wheelis AY, McFarlane M, Lee H, Fortmann SP. The relationship between tobacco access and use among adolescents: a four community study. Soc Sci Med 1999 ; 48: 759-775.

    32) Alikasifoglu M, Erginoz E, Ercan O, Uysal O, Kaymak-Albayrak D, Ilter O. J Adolesc Health 2002; 30: 7-8.

    33) Stein RJ, Haddock CK, O'Byrne KK, Hymowitz N, Schwab J. The pediatrician's role in reducing tobacco exposure in children. Pediatrics. 2000 ; 106: E66.Review

    34) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tobacco use among high school students-United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998; 47: 229-233.

    35) http://www.cdc.gov/nchs. 1970 and 2000 National Health Interview Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics.

    36) http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_1994/index.htm. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People A Report of the Surgeon General (1994)

    37) Burton D. Tobacco cessation programs for adolescents. In: Richmond R, ed. Interventions for smokers. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1994: 95-105

    38) Tyas SL, Pederson LL. Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control 1998;7:409-420.

    39) Rohrmann S, Becker N. Kroke A, Boeing H. Trends in cigarette smoking in the German centers of the European Prospective İnvestigation into Cancer and Nutritio(EPIC): the influence of the educational level. Prev Med. 2003 ; 36: 409-419.

  • Başa Dön
  • Özet
  • Giriş
  • Materyal ve Metot
  • Bulgular
  • Tartışma
  • Sonuç
  • Kaynaklar
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]


    "Türkmedline Ulusal Atıf İndeksi"ne dahil dergilerde aldığı atıflar:
    TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni
    RUHUŞEN KUTLU, SELMA ÇİVİ
    KONYA İLİ LİSE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN SİGARA İÇME SIKLIĞI VE ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER
    THE FREQUENCY AND AFFECTING FACTORS OF SMOKING AMONG THE HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS IN KONYA

    TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni 2007; 6(4): 273 - 278.
    [ÖZET]
    Marmara Medical Journal
    RUHUŞEN KUTLU, SELMA ÇİVİ, ONUR KARAOĞLU
    BELEDİYE ZABITA MEMURLARINDA SİGARA İÇME VE DEPRESYONUN YAŞAM KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ
    THE EFFECTS OF DEPRESSION AND SMOKING UPON THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MUNICIPAL POLICE OFFICERS

    Marmara Medical Journal 2008; 21(3): 220 - 230.
    [ÖZET]